Our Distorted Reality- Understanding its Real Nature

The word reality has a double meaning; it either refers to the state of things as they exist- or –an idealized view of the way things exist. And in the real world, – just like the word reality itself- the gap between actual reality and preferred reality can be a chasm.

Here’s something to consider; are the political perspectives bandied about on news channels just theatre for the masses, for entertainment value only, not meant to inform but to ambush, providing a cover for the real story, which most miss in the din of telecasts with endless analysis by pontificating experts. The perspectives I refer to here are the established ISIS, US/Russia narrative.

The term New World Order which hints at a future world system or government is probably familiar to everyone, but what of the less familiar terms like Deep State – or Shadow government.A deep state is a state within a state, operates wholly independently from the visible one with its own structures and functions, has its own chain of command, and operates secretively.It controls and directs the legitimate state at the top levels of its pyramid.
The deep state can be said then to be in collusion with legitimate government at its top tier and committed to implementing a specific global agenda.

I’ll add; -…an agenda cloaked in utopian like language of equality and brotherhood, but essentially one of servitude in the form of a modern, technocratic, feudalistic- based system. This is evidenced by climate-change agenda 30’s goals; essentially a consolidation of wealth on the back of a power-grab of the world’s resources by the elite, by its very nature anti-humanistic.

To grasp the direction in which we’re headed it’s important to look back before we can project the way forward. Information hidden in plain sight abounds, available to anyone who is interested enough to search for it, and study the view from all angles.
What and where is the evidence for the existence of a deep state you might ask?
Well, as mentioned further- up – insiders. Although it’s highly unlikely that contemporary ‘insiders’ would identify themselves, preferring to be quoted anonymously, we have the historical written testimonies of the elite themselves via their appointed messengers or those in the know who opt out.
The twentieth century prominent ‘prophets’ are; Carroll Quigley, George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, HG Wells, Bertrand Russell, Winston Churchill and John F Kennedy.
The motivations for insiders revealing information is either to warn- in their personal capacity- or to act as messengers on behalf of the elite. And why would they reveal their plans anyway? well part hubris- because they can-as well as using a form of reverse psychology i.e. the masses won’t believe the elite to be so bold as to advertise their plans upfront, it’s too in-your-face- too obvious. And the proof of the pudding is………….. It has served those at the top well, as people generally do hold this view.

The power welded by financiers in the political realm, the interconnected spider’s -web of high-profile trusts, foundations and NGO’s, the influence of secret societies, the existence of a powerful ruling cabal were all concepts introduced by Professor of History Carroll Quigley in his best known published work Tragedy and Hope. He said; there does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international network which operates to some extent in the same way the radical right believes the communists act.

Winston Churchill, Britain’s World War Two Prime Minister, was even more forthcoming, speaking of; a worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, envious malevolence and impossible equality. He acknowledges its role in the French and Bolshevik revolutions, ; ……..this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of America and Britain have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head, and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. Winston Churchill published this in the London Illustrated Sunday Herald, 8 February 1920.

George Orwell is best known for his dystopian futuristic works, 1984 and An Animal Farm, portrayed a tightly controlled society, governed by the thought police in a surveillance or police state, unlike his peer Aldous Huxley who predicted a more benign scientific dictatorship with a medicated docile populace. They both wagered whose prediction of the future would win-out in the end.
It’s safe to say whose vision prevailed in the end, yup- George Orwell’s.
Many of Orwell’s prophecies have come to pass, democracy is a rhetorical device, peace is perpetual war, global is imperial, while reform means regression even destruction.

HG Wells, one of the earliest sci-fi writer’s, also a futurologist, uncannily projected societal and technological developments spanning 100 years at the turn of the twentieth century. In 1901 he predicted the invention of the aeroplane, specifically as an instrument of war; the concept of the atomic bomb was also attributed to him- three decades before its formulae was discovered- how so?
He foresaw the collapse of Capitalism late in the twentieth century, in theory he was probably the first trans humanist, introducing ideas in the field of genetics unique to that time. He eventually became a member of the Fabian society.

Bertrand Russell another Fabian member wrote; education has two purposes, to form the mind, the other to train the citizen. He muses that one kind of education will be for normal citizens and another for the future holders of scientific power. Formal lessons provided to ordinary citizens will be in the form of the cinema or radio, so there you have it folks, Russell confirms what is already suspected, brainwashing or mind control is FOR the normal citizenry. Switch off those TV’s NOW. And throw away those newspapers while you’re at it. People must learn to love their servitude; this is the mantra of the elites.
Russell wrote that mass psychology would be the subject of most importance, politically speaking. The growth in modern propaganda increases the importance of mind control.
Russell pointed out discoveries which upset the official view of fundamentals, would incur disfavour if discovered by young men, in other words, don’t question established-held views, and digest what your professors tell you without question. Russell mentions an official metaphysic, intellectually unimportant but politically sacrosanct would prevail. What was he referring to- evolution?
He also summed up the prevailing mind set of academia, with its emphasis on authority and seniority at tertiary level, resulting in the diminishing of scientific progress, with scientific research being concealed from all but a few.

Cryptic language certainly featured in the address of American President John F Kennedy to the American Newspaper Publishers Association fifty four years ago.
He begins by saying the very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society.
That Americans have always been historically opposed to secret societies, secret oaths and secret proceedings. So far, taking these words at face value he is speaking of secret societies.
But then, his speech takes a strange turn, he continues;
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence- on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly-knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
Just what was John F Kennedy referring to? His speech has left many mulling over its meaning this past half century, some say he was speaking of the dangers of secret societies per se, others say he was referring to communism, others still to the threat posed by Russia itself.

Let’s attempt a deconstruction of sorts; Is Kennedy alluding to the origin of the conspiracy by way of his remarks on secret societies, for example a freemasonry link, it’s certainly plausible.
The ‘we are opposed’ part of the speech refers; ……….’around the world’, refers to an international conspiracy. Monolithic means colossal, it is derived from the word monolith which can refer to an organisation. This organisation has tiers and functions resembling that of a state, i.e. military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic et al. This state relies on subversion of the legitimate state as its goal, is concealed, a state within a state- equalling a deep state.
It is not conjecture to conclude that Kennedy found himself fighting for control and authority as president, against an established intelligence and military network, especially at the height of the cold war, the strategies employed by the architects of the Bay of Pigs invasion were surely grounded upon the assumption that provocation of the two super powers resulting in nuclear exchange was possible.

US Democratic Senator from Hawaii, Daniel Inouye, was involved in the Iran-Contra investigations of the 1980’s, chairing a special committee from 1987 to 1989 referred to the revealed operations testified by witnesses as the work of a ‘secret government’, saying, “there exists a shadowy government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of the national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.

Leave a Reply